Skip to content
Academy
Marketing Academy · Field Work●Copywriting
CoreTeardown· 45 minutes

The Six-Section Teardown: Finding What's Costing Conversions

Chewy

Objective: Given two synthetic-realistic landing page specimens, identify the specific copy defects costing conversions across the lesson's required sections.

You're a CRO copywriter reviewing two draft landing pages for Chewy's new pet-insurance product before they go live to real traffic.

Find defects across headline, social proof, CTA count, and reading level using the lesson's playbook, and don't flag correct choices as defects.

Before you start

What you'll need

Free path (everything below is enough to finish)

FreeAnnotate specimens and log defects

Free commenting for flagging line-level issues

The process

Specimens to review

This hero section has 2 real defects. Find them, and don't flag the subheadline length, which is fine at one sentence.

Sample output
HERO SECTION:
Headline: 'Welcome to Chewy Pet Insurance'
Subheadline: 'We provide comprehensive coverage solutions for your beloved companion animals.'
Social proof line: 'Trusted by thousands of pet parents nationwide!'

Specimen: synthetic, realistic

This body-and-CTA section has 2 real defects. Find them.

Sample output
BODY COPY (bullet list):
'Our platform utilizes advanced actuarial methodologies to determine premium calculations for comprehensive coverage optimization.'

BUTTONS ON PAGE: 'Get a Quote' (top), 'Learn More' (middle), 'Contact Sales' (bottom)

Specimen: synthetic, realistic

Final deliverable

A defect log across both specimens naming each issue, its severity, and the lesson section it violates.

See a reference example
Sample output
Squarespace landing page teardown (excerpt)

DEFECT: Headline 'Welcome to Squarespace' — leads with the brand name, not the outcome. Severity: critical.
CLEARED: Single CTA button 'Start my free trial' — correct, one action only.

Success criteria

You're done when you can:

  • Correctly identifies both critical defects in each of the 2 specimens
  • Correctly clears the 2 distractors as legitimate choices, not defects