Teardown: Sorting a Distinctive Asset Portfolio into Protect, Build, or Drop
Objective: Apply the lesson's Fame/Uniqueness thresholds to classify four real-style brand assets into Protect, Build, or Drop, and correctly identify one asset that can't be classified yet.
You're a brand analyst asked to review Wise's asset portfolio ahead of a planning cycle, using Fame and Uniqueness scores from a category buyer study.
Classify each asset card using the lesson's thresholds, and flag any asset the study didn't actually measure.
Before you start
What you'll need
Free path (everything below is enough to finish)
Free, quick to build a sortable classification table
The process
Specimens to review
Using the lesson's Stage 3 thresholds (Fame above 70%, Uniqueness above 60% = Protect), classify this asset and justify the call.
ASSET CARD — Primary Color Wise's signature bright green, applied consistently across the app, debit cards, marketing site, and out-of-home ads since the 2021 rebrand. Measured Fame: 74% (correctly linked to Wise by category buyers) Measured Uniqueness: 68% (not confused with any competitor)
Specimen: synthetic, realistic
Classify this asset per Stage 3 and identify what the inconsistent usage is doing to its Fame score.
ASSET CARD — Wordmark Casing The lowercase 'wise' logotype is the documented standard, but partner integration pages and some app store listings render it as 'WISE' in all caps. Measured Fame: 55% Measured Uniqueness: 71%
Specimen: synthetic, realistic
Classify this asset and explain the risk of continued investment in it as-is.
ASSET CARD — App Icon Illustration Style A rounded, friendly icon style used throughout in-app illustrations. Category research shows 3 competing fintech apps use a visually similar rounded-icon style. Measured Fame: 62% Measured Uniqueness: 22%
Specimen: synthetic, realistic
Can this asset be classified into Protect / Build / Drop using Stage 3? If not, what has to happen first?
ASSET CARD — Transfer Confirmation Sound A short chime plays when a transfer completes successfully. The sound has never been tested with real customers or measured for Fame or Uniqueness; the design team believes it 'feels premium.'
Specimen: synthetic, realistic
Final deliverable
A completed classification table sorting all 4 assets into Protect / Build / Drop / Needs Testing, with a one-line justification citing the actual Fame or Uniqueness number for each.
See a reference example
Nubank, Asset Classification (excerpt) Primary purple: Fame 81%, Uniqueness 76% -> PROTECT Card tap-to-pay animation: Fame 48%, Uniqueness 64% -> BUILD Generic rounded sans typeface: Fame 58%, Uniqueness 19% -> DROP/REPLACE App notification sound: untested -> NEEDS TESTING before classification
Success criteria
You're done when you can:
- Correctly classifies at least 3 of 4 assets using the stated Fame/Uniqueness thresholds
- Flags the untested sound asset as unclassifiable rather than guessing
- Justification cites the specific Fame or Uniqueness number, not a subjective impression