The Corporate Gifting Tiers: Auditing Allbirds' New B2B Price Sheet
Objective: Given a draft 3-tier price sheet for a new corporate-gifting program, apply the lesson's anchoring and charm-pricing levers to decide what's working, what's missing, and what to fix before it ships.
You're a growth marketer at Allbirds, the sustainable footwear brand, building the pricing page for a new 'Allbirds for Teams' corporate-gifting program aimed at HR and People teams ordering in bulk for onboarding kits.
Score the draft price sheet against anchoring order and charm-pricing conventions, then rewrite the weakest lever with a one-line justification.
Before you start
What you'll need
Free path (everything below is enough to finish)
Free, no account friction, sortable columns for price/order review
The process
2 steps
Step 01 of 02
The lesson's Lever 1 says the first number a visitor sees becomes the reference point for every price after it. Listing the top tier first makes the middle tier feel like the reasonable choice, not the ceiling.
The draft page lists tiers in this order, top to bottom: Starter ($299 / 25 pairs), Growth ($899 / 100 pairs), Enterprise ($2,400 / 300 pairs). Does this order help or hurt the anchor?
Procedure
- Open the sheet and note the current top-to-bottom display order.
- Flag that Starter, the cheapest tier, is listed first — this anchors buyers on $299, not on the enterprise ceiling.
- Reorder rows: Enterprise first, then Growth, then Starter last.
- Re-check that Enterprise has at least one real past order behind it (per the lesson's fake-anchor warning) before using it as the anchor.
REORDERED DISPLAY (top to bottom) 1. Enterprise — $2,400 / 300 pairs 2. Growth — $899 / 100 pairs (highlight this one) 3. Starter — $299 / 25 pairs Anchor check: Enterprise has 3 confirmed past orders (Q1-Q3) — real anchor, not fake.
Healthy
Highest tier displayed first, with confirmed real purchases behind it.
Unhealthy
Cheapest tier displayed first, or a top tier with zero real customers.
What this means
An anchor only works if it's both first in view and genuinely purchasable — order alone doesn't fix a fake anchor.
So what do I do about it?
| Symptom | Action | Effort |
|---|---|---|
| Starter tier listed first on the page | Flip display order so Enterprise leads | 5 min |
| Enterprise tier has never actually sold | Either find a real past order or drop the tier and re-anchor on Growth | 30 min |
Step 02 of 02
The lesson's Lever 3 says charm-price the low-sensitivity entry tier ($29, $49) and round the top tier ($500, $2,000) — round numbers read as premium, 99-cent endings can cheapen a high-ticket offer.
Starter is priced at $299 flat and Enterprise at $2,400 flat. Which tier, if any, is priced in the wrong direction for its position?
Procedure
- Check Starter: $299 is a round number sitting in the low-sensitivity, high-scrutiny entry slot.
- Reprice Starter to $289 to signal a sharpened, competitive floor.
- Confirm Enterprise stays round ($2,400, not $2,399) — a charm ending would cheapen the premium tier.
Starter: $299 -> $289 (charm-priced, entry tier) Growth: $899 (unchanged, mid-tier stays round) Enterprise: $2,400 (unchanged, round premium anchor)
Healthy
Entry tier ends near a charm price; top tier stays round.
Unhealthy
Entry tier is round while a high-ticket tier ends in .99.
What this means
Charm pricing and rounding are position-dependent, not a single rule applied everywhere.
So what do I do about it?
| Symptom | Action | Effort |
|---|---|---|
| Entry tier priced at a flat round number | Shift to a charm ending just below the round number | 5 min |
Final deliverable
A reordered, repriced 3-tier price sheet with a one-line note on each change and why.
See a reference example
MVMT for Teams, corporate order tiers (revised) 1. Enterprise — $2,400 / 300 pairs (anchor, 3 confirmed past orders) 2. Growth — $899 / 100 pairs — MOST POPULAR 3. Starter — $289 / 25 pairs (charm-priced entry) Change log: - Reordered high-to-low so Enterprise anchors first - Starter repriced $299 -> $289 - Enterprise kept round, not charm-priced
Success criteria
You're done when you can:
- Correctly identifies the display-order problem and fixes it
- Correctly reprices only the entry tier, leaving the premium tier round