Skip to content
Academy
Marketing Academy · Field Work●Paid Ads
MiniTeardown· 25 minutes

Spot the Broken Test: Three MVMT Test Plans

MVMT

Objective: Given three synthetic MVMT-style creative test plans, identify which testing discipline each one violates and why the result can't be trusted.

You've joined MVMT's growth team as a contractor for one week to review the last quarter's creative test plans before the next round launches. Three plans are queued for a repeat.

Read each test plan as written, decide whether its result is trustworthy, and flag exactly what broke it.

Before you start

What you'll need

Free path (everything below is enough to finish)

FreeLog each defect found, with severity, against the three test plans

Free, no account friction, easy to sort by severity

The process

Specimens to review

Decide whether this test's conclusion ('scale Version B') is trustworthy. List every reason it isn't.

Sample output
TEST PLAN: New Watch Face Ad
We changed the hero image, the headline, and the CTA button color all at once. Ran both ads in the same ad set for 2 days. Version B has slightly more clicks so we're pausing A and scaling B tomorrow.

Specimen: synthetic, realistic

Decide whether this test is set up to produce a learnable result. List every reason it isn't.

Sample output
TEST PLAN: Hook Test
No written hypothesis, we just tried a new intro line to see what sticks. New creative is being tested directly against our 8-month-old top-performing evergreen ad. Budget and conversion target were not set before launch.

Specimen: synthetic, realistic

Decide whether this test could possibly produce a trustworthy winner. List every reason it can't.

Sample output
TEST PLAN: Format Test, 'Q3 Creative Refresh'
Comparing a UGC video vs. a polished studio video vs. a new CTA button text vs. a new background color, all in one experiment. Budget: $50 total, ran for 3 days, 12 conversions across all variants combined.

Specimen: synthetic, realistic

Final deliverable

A defect log across all 3 test plans, plus a rewritten one-variable, correctly-budgeted, correctly-timed test plan for the worst offender.

See a reference example
Sample output
Nykaa defect log (excerpt)

PLAN: Lipstick launch hook test
Severity: critical — Hook, thumbnail, and price badge all changed in the same test
Severity: moderate — Ran 4 days, under the 7-14 day minimum

REWRITE
Variable changed: hook only (first 3 seconds of a 15-second video)
Budget: ₹85,000 for 2 variants, targeting 75 conversions each
Duration: 10 days

Success criteria

You're done when you can:

  • Correctly identifies the multi-variable violation in items 1 and 3
  • Correctly identifies the missing hypothesis and unfair-comparison violations in item 2
  • Does not flag any of the distractors as defects